Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- jvx:reference [2020/06/10 12:17]
cduncan [What else?]
+++ jvx:reference [2020/06/10 12:34]
cduncan [Resource and UIResource]
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 ===== The Patterns =====
-[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factory_%28object-oriented_programming%29|The factory pattern]] is an important pattern in [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_programming|Object-oriented programming]] It empowers us to delegate the creation of objects to another object that is not known at design and/or compile time. That allows us to use objects which have not been created by us but merely “provided” to us by an unknown-to-us source.
+[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factory_%28object-oriented_programming%29|The factory pattern]] is an important pattern in [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_programming|object-oriented programming]] It empowers us to delegate the creation of objects to another object that is not known at design and/or compile time. That allows us to use objects which have not been created by us but merely “provided” to us by an unknown-to-us source.
 [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridge_pattern|The bridge pattern]], on the other hand, describes a technique which wraps implementations in another implementation and forwards all or most functionality to that wrapped implementation. This allows us to mix and match functionality without the need to have it in all implementations at once.
@@ Line 176: / Line 176: @@
 ===== What else? =====
-That is how [[https://sourceforge.net/projects/jvx/|JVx]] works in regards to the UI layer. It depends on “technology specific stacks” which can be swapped out and implemented for pretty much every GUI framework out there. We currently provide support for Swing, JavaFX, and Vaadin, but we also had implementations for GWT and Qt. Additionally, we do support a “headless” implementation which uses lightweight objects which can be serialized and send over the wire without much effort.
+That is how [[https://sourceforge.net/projects/jvx/|JVx]] works in regards to the UI layer. It depends on “technology-specific stacks”, which can be swapped out and implemented for pretty much every GUI framework out there. We currently provide support for Swing, JavaFX, and Vaadin, but we also had implementations for GWT and Qt. Additionally, we do support a “headless” implementation, which uses lightweight objects that can be serialized and send over the wire without much effort.
-===== Adding a new Technology =====
+===== Adding a New Technology =====
-Adding support for a new Technology is as straightforward as one can imagine, simply creating the Extensions/Implementations layers and implementing the factory for that Technology. Giving a complete manual would be out for scope for this document, but the most simple approach to adding a new stack to [[https://sourceforge.net/projects/jvx/|JVx]] is to start with stubbing out the ''%%IFactory%%'' and implementing ''%%IWindow%%''. Once that one window shows up, it’s just implementing one interface after another in a quite straightforward manner. And in the end, your application can switch to yet another GUI framework without the need to change your code.
+Adding support for a new technology is as straightforward as one can imagine: simply creating the extensions/implementations layers and implementing the factory for that technology. Giving a complete manual would be out for scope for this document, but the most simple approach to adding a new stack to [[https://sourceforge.net/projects/jvx/|JVx]] is to start with stubbing out the ''%%IFactory%%'' and implementing ''%%IWindow%%''. Once that one window shows up, it’s just implementing one interface after another in a quite straightforward manner. In the end, your application can switch to yet another GUI framework without the need to change your code.
 ===== Conclusion =====
-Even though the stack of [[https://sourceforge.net/projects/jvx/|JVx]] is more complicated compared with other GUI or application frameworks, this complexity is set off by the benefits it brings. One can change the used GUI Technology without much effort and, most important of all, without touching the application logic at all.
+Even though the stack of [[https://sourceforge.net/projects/jvx/|JVx]] is more complicated compared with other GUI or application frameworks, this complexity is set off by the benefits it brings. One can change the used GUI technology without much effort and, most importantly, without touching the application logic at all.
 ====== Resource and UIResource ======
-Let’s talk about Resources and UIResources, and why they sound similar but are not the same.
+Let’s talk about resources and UI resources and why they sound similar yet are not the same.
 ===== The Basics =====
-We’ve [[#encapsulated_by_a_wrapper_class|encapsulated by a wrapper class]]. An “UIResource” on the other hand is an encapsulated concrete implementation of one of the interfaces on the UI layer.
+We’ve [[#encapsulated_by_a_wrapper_class|encapsulated by a wrapper class]]. A “UIResource”, on the other hand, is an encapsulated concrete implementation of one of the interfaces on the UI layer.
-Let’s do a short brush-up on how the [[https://sourceforge.net/projects/jvx/|JVx]] architecture looks like in regards to the GUI stack:
+Let’s do a short overview on how the [[https://sourceforge.net/projects/jvx/|JVx]] architecture looks like in regards to the GUI stack:
-{{:jvx:reference:resource.png?nolink|The JVx layers revisited. UI-Wrapper and Implementation implement the interface, Extension and Technology do not.}}
+{{:jvx:reference:resource.png?nolink|The JVx layers revisited. UI wrapper and implementation implement the interface, extension and technology do not.}}
-The UI Wrappers are the main UI classes which are used to create the GUI (f.e. ''%%UIButton%%''). These are wrapping the Implementations (f.e. ''%%SwingButton%%'') which themselves are wrapping the Extension/Technology (f.e. a ''%%JVxButton%%''/''%%JButton%%''). Only the UI and Implementation classes are implementing the interface are required for the component (f.e. ''%%IButton%%''). That also means that the Implementation is dependent on the Extension/Technology component, but the UI can use any object which implements the interface.
+The UI wrappers are the main UI classes that are used to create the GUI (f.e. ''%%UIButton%%''). These are wrapping the implementations (f.e. ''%%SwingButton%%''), which themselves are wrapping the extension/technology (f.e. a ''%%JVxButton%%''/''%%JButton%%''). Only the UI and implementation classes are implementing the interface are required for the component (f.e. ''%%IButton%%''). That also means that the implementation is dependent on the extension/technology component, but the UI can use any object which implements the interface.
-Now, with that knowledge we can start defining what is what:
+Now, with that knowledge, we can start defining what is what:
-{{:jvx:reference:resource2.png?nolink|The UI-Wrapper is the uicomponent, the Implementation is the uiresource and the Extension and Technology are the resource.}}
+{{:jvx:reference:resource2.png?nolink|The UI wrapper is the  UI component, the implementation is the UI resource, and the extension and technology are the resource.}}
-The resource itself, accessed by calling ''%%<uiwrapper>.getResource()%%'', is the Extension/Technology component. The uiresource can be accessed by calling ''%%<uiwrapper>.getUIResource()%%''. The uicomponent can be accessed by calling ''%%<uiwrapper>.getUIComponent()%%'' and is usually the UI Wrapper class itself. If we use our previous Swing example, the resource would be a ''%%JVxButton%%''/''%%JButton%%'', the uiresource would be the ''%%SwingButton%%'' and the uicomponent would be the ''%%UIButton%%''.
+The resource itself, accessed by calling ''%%<uiwrapper>.getResource()%%'', is the extension/technology component. The  UI resource can be accessed by calling ''%%<uiwrapper>.getUIResource()%%''. The UI component can be accessed by calling ''%%<uiwrapper>.getUIComponent()%%'' and is usually the UI wrapper class itself. If we use our previous Swing example, the resource would be a ''%%JVxButton%%''/''%%JButton%%'', the  UI resource would be the ''%%SwingButton%%'' and the UI component would be the ''%%UIButton%%''.
-As one can see, access to all objects which are comprising the GUI is at all times possible. We, of course, have the UI component, we can access the Implementation component and we can access the Extension/Technology component. Theoretically we could also swap them at runtime, but in [[https://sourceforge.net/projects/jvx/|JVx]] this is limited to the construction of the object to greatly reduce the error potential and complexity of the framework code.
+As one can see, access to all objects which comprise GUI possible at all times.. We, of course, have the UI component, we can access the implementation component, and we can access the extension/technology component. Theoretically, we could also swap them at runtime, but in [[https://sourceforge.net/projects/jvx/|JVx]], this is limited to the construction of the object to greatly reduce the error potential and complexity of the framework code.
 ===== Creating custom components =====